March 15, 2008 at 1:12 am 1 comment

Before I fell in love with Steiner I was very interested in Montessori education. There are many things the two philosophies have in common, but one of the areas they part ways on is ‘fantasy’. 

In The Absorbent Mind” Maria Montessori talks about children’s love of fantasy, magic and pretend play as if it was a sign that something was wrong. Too much ‘pretend’ play should be discouraged, and children gently brought back into the ‘real’ world. This was something I could never quite get my head around. If any Montessorians are reading this and wish to comment, I’d love to hear from you. 

Steiner on the other hand sees that the first seven years are ripe for imaginative play, and that a rich fantasy life should be encouraged to develop children’s full creative potential. This seems to be born out by modern science, in fact a whole episode of Child of Our Time  was recently devoted to the development of creativity and the ‘crisis’ around seven years when the real world comes crashing in.  I remember as a child being very deeply in fantasy land. I had an imaginary friend, I had passionate relationships with my dolls. My aunty remembers giving me a small play-horse and says that I took it into my room and held it up, turning it around and staring at it in awe.

I would love Munchkin to have the same love of fantasy that I had, and find Steiner philosophy full of wonderful ideas to encourage this.           

   In ‘You are your child’s first teacher’, Rahima dedicates a whole chapter to developing fantasy and imagination. Dolls, toys, fairytales and nursery rhymes are all important parts of this.  She explains that  “Everything the young child takes in makes a profound impression on him”. So quality toys, made of natural materials, and that are ‘open ended’ so children can play with them in a myriad of ways are the ideal. I have seen this at playgroup where a circle of rough wood becomes a plate, a hat, a shield, a wall, a door … all in the space of a morning. A piece of blue coloured muslin becomes the sky, the sea, a curtain, a blanket, a peekaboo device.  

Dolls play a particular role in Steiner play. Rahima writes that “We need to put our attention into the quality of the dolls our children have. Not only their expression is important, but the quality of the material as well. Is the doll hard and cold or soft and huggable? Is the hair platinum and grotesquely matted after a week’s play? A soft cloth doll with yarn hair and a neutral expression provides the child with a companion who can change as she does… Barbie is a multimillion dollar enterprise and encouraging our young children to indulge in her designer jeans and convertible supportive values that impoverish the world of the young child” 

And Fairy Tales and Nursery Rhymes are also very ‘Steiner’. I always had a problem with Fairy Tales, and I still hate the Hansel and Gretel tale, and Cinderella. Children being treated badly and alone in the world made me hugely sad as a child, and today. Rahima says to simply avoid stories that bring out these feelings in you as an adult, because your fear will be transmitted to children. However, she suggests a wide range of lovely Fairy Tales, that are actually very sweet.  For three year olds she suggests 

Sweet Porridge

Goldilocks Little TuppensLittle Louse and Little FleaThe TurnipThe Mitten

The Gingerbread Boy

The Johnny CakeThe Hungry Cat  And my last comment on this, rather long and drawn out post, is to dismiss any myth that Steiner parents don’t read to their children. While telling stories to them, and not being ‘book obsessed’ is encouraged, I had a discussion with a woman from the Steiner Federation here who said that we should ‘fill our children’s lives with books’ and continue reading to them not only as babies, but right up in to their teens. Wise lady that.


Entry filed under: Steiner/Waldorf. Tags: .

Steiner blessings Supermarket Confessions

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. henitsirk  |  March 30, 2008 at 1:50 am

    Fairy tales are so powerful, as you experienced yourself! My kids (5 1/2 and almost 4) were quite disturbed by Hansel and Gretel, but they love Sweet Porridge, Little Tuppens, The Gingerbread Boy, and Briar Rose. I think the scarier stories speak to slightly older kids on a spiritual level. I think they know that the things happening in the stories don’t reflect real life–though when they are very young, they can’t make that distinction, hence my kids’ dislike for the idea of the stepmother wanting to abandon the children in the woods. Very small children have a different kind of imagination than older children.

    There are some wonderful books about fairy tales from an anthroposophical perspective. I recommend The Wisdom of Fairy Tales by Rudolf Meyer.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Not everything that counts can be countedAnd not everything that can be counted counts. Albert Einstein

Recent Posts



%d bloggers like this: